<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cobb St. Pierre Lewis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acquit.ca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acquit.ca</link>
	<description>Vancouver Criminal Defense Law Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reasonable Doubt: How to find a lawyer who’s right for you</title>
		<link>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-how-to-find-a-lawyer-who%e2%80%99s-right-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-how-to-find-a-lawyer-who%e2%80%99s-right-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acquit.ca/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will come as no shock to you that lawyers come in all types and temperaments—even criminal lawyers. But how do you go about choosing one? First of all you have to find one. There are numerous ways to go to find one, but different methods will turn up different types of results. http://www.straight.com/article-660251/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-how-find-lawyer-whos-right-you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-348" title="how to find a lawyer" src="http://acquit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/how-to-find-a-lawyer-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />It will come as no shock to you that lawyers come in all types and  temperaments—even criminal lawyers. But how do you go about choosing  one?</p>
<p>First of all you have to find one. There are numerous ways to go to find  one, but different methods will turn up different types of results.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-660251/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-how-find-lawyer-whos-right-you">http://www.straight.com/article-660251/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-how-find-lawyer-whos-right-you</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-how-to-find-a-lawyer-who%e2%80%99s-right-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasonable Doubt: Lawyer-client privilege not always clear-cut</title>
		<link>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-lawyer-client-privilege-not-always-clear-cut/</link>
		<comments>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-lawyer-client-privilege-not-always-clear-cut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acquit.ca/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most important concepts in our legal system is that of solicitor-client privilege (which goes hand in hand with a lawyer’s duty of confidentiality to their clients). It’s highly important that lawyers hold client communications in the strictest confidence otherwise clients won’t feel safe enough to make full disclosure to their lawyers. Communications &#124; <a href="http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-lawyer-client-privilege-not-always-clear-cut/">read more&#8230;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-344" title="confidential" src="http://acquit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/confidential-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />One of the most important concepts in our legal system is that of  solicitor-client privilege (which goes hand in hand with a lawyer’s duty  of confidentiality to their clients). It’s highly important that  lawyers hold client communications in the strictest confidence otherwise  clients won’t feel safe enough to make full disclosure to their  lawyers. Communications are subject to the privilege when three  preconditions are met: 1) it’s a communication between a lawyer and  client, 2) which entails the seeking or giving of legal advice, and 3)  which is intended to be confidential by the parties.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-649001/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-lawyerclient-privilege-not-always-clearcut">http://www.straight.com/article-649001/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-lawyerclient-privilege-not-always-clearcut</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-lawyer-client-privilege-not-always-clear-cut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasonable Doubt: Police under microscope with B.C. Independent Investigations Office</title>
		<link>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-police-under-microscope-with-b-c-independent-investigations-office/</link>
		<comments>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-police-under-microscope-with-b-c-independent-investigations-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acquit.ca/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Dziekanski and Frank Paul are two men whose deaths at the hands of police resulted in civilian inquiries into police decisions and actions. The Braidwood Inquiry and the Davies Commission have fundamentally changed the way we police the police. As a direct result of these two inquiries, the B.C. government is establishing a new &#124; <a href="http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-police-under-microscope-with-b-c-independent-investigations-office/">read more&#8230;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-335" title="police light" src="http://acquit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/police-light-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />Robert Dziekanski and Frank Paul are two men whose deaths at the hands of police resulted in civilian inquiries into police decisions and actions. The Braidwood Inquiry and the Davies Commission have fundamentally changed the way we police the police. As a direct result of these two inquiries, the B.C. government is establishing a new office, the Independent Investigations Office (IIO), which is responsible for investigating incidents where a person is grievously injured or killed at the hands of the police.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-643671/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-police-under-microscope-bc-independent-investigations-office">http://www.straight.com/article-643671/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-police-under-microscope-bc-independent-investigations-office</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-police-under-microscope-with-b-c-independent-investigations-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasonable Doubt: How lawyers are governed and disciplined in B.C.</title>
		<link>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-how-lawyers-are-governed-and-disciplined-in-b-c/</link>
		<comments>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-how-lawyers-are-governed-and-disciplined-in-b-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acquit.ca/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers, especially criminal lawyers, come up against ethical and professional quandaries on a daily basis. No matter how long one has practiced, there will always be strange situations that come up where the lawyer will need advice and guidance on how to proceed. I wanted to talk about solicitor-client privilege this week and some of &#124; <a href="http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-how-lawyers-are-governed-and-disciplined-in-b-c/">read more&#8230;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://acquit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/scale-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="scale" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-331" />Lawyers, especially criminal lawyers, come up against ethical and professional quandaries on a daily basis. No matter how long one has practiced, there will always be strange situations that come up where the lawyer will need advice and guidance on how to proceed. I wanted to talk about solicitor-client privilege this week and some of the ethical problems that arise but I realized I couldn’t do that without laying the foundation for how lawyers are governed and disciplined.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-638106/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-how-lawyers-are-governed-and-disciplined-bc">http://www.straight.com/article-638106/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-how-lawyers-are-governed-and-disciplined-bc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acquit.ca/2012/04/reasonable-doubt-how-lawyers-are-governed-and-disciplined-in-b-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasonable Doubt: Who is Joseph Kony, and what is the International Criminal Court?</title>
		<link>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-who-is-joseph-kony-and-what-is-the-international-criminal-court/</link>
		<comments>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-who-is-joseph-kony-and-what-is-the-international-criminal-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acquit.ca/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, you may have noticed a particular video about Joseph Kony posted by your friends on their Facebook wall or received an email or text message blast with a link to the video. The video is part of the Kony 2012 campaign started by a nonprofit group called Invisible Children. Invisible Children is working toward &#124; <a href="http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-who-is-joseph-kony-and-what-is-the-international-criminal-court/">read more&#8230;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-315" title="kony-2012" src="http://acquit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kony-2012-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />Recently, you may have noticed a particular video about Joseph Kony posted by your friends on their Facebook wall or received an email or text message blast with a link to the video. The video is part of the Kony 2012 campaign started by a nonprofit group called Invisible Children.</p>
<p>Invisible Children is working toward bringing Joseph Kony to justice for abducting children and organizing armies of child soldiers in Uganda. The purpose of the campaign is to make Joseph Kony as famous as your average to A-list Hollywood celebrity.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-631886/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-who-joseph-kony-and-what-international-criminal-court">http://www.straight.com/article-631886/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-who-joseph-kony-and-what-international-criminal-court</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-who-is-joseph-kony-and-what-is-the-international-criminal-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waivers and hearsay explained</title>
		<link>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/waivers-and-hearsay-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/waivers-and-hearsay-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acquit.ca/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want your charge transferred from one jurisdiction to another, there are a number of caveats. First, the offence cannot be one listed under Section 469 of the Criminal Code (such as murder or treason). Second, you have to plead guilty—if you get a charge transferred and you change your mind, the charge gets &#124; <a href="http://acquit.ca/2012/03/waivers-and-hearsay-explained/">read more&#8230;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-310" title="36_literary-dictionary" src="http://acquit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/36_literary-dictionary-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />If you want your charge transferred from one jurisdiction to another, there are a number of caveats. First, the offence cannot be one listed under Section 469 of the Criminal Code (such as murder or treason). Second, you <em>have</em> to plead guilty—if you get a charge transferred and you change your mind, the charge gets sent back to the originating jurisdiction. Third, the attorney general must give consent for this to be done (usually in the form of Crown counsel).</p>
<p>Hearsay is any out of court statement that is being used in a trial for the truth of its contents. The general rule is that hearsay is inadmissible subject to a number of exceptions. Hearsay can be verbal, written, or implied (i.e. actions such as nodding one’s head or pointing a finger can be considered implied statements and count as hearsay).<strong></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-623101/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-waivers-and-hearsay-explained"><strong>http://www.straight.com/article-623101/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-waivers-and-hearsay-explained</strong></a><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/waivers-and-hearsay-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasonable Doubt: What does Bill C-30 mean for privacy?</title>
		<link>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-what-does-bill-c-30-mean-for-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-what-does-bill-c-30-mean-for-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acquit.ca/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who have been living under a rock for the past week or two, Bill C-30 is the proposed legislation that will require telecommunication service providers to provide personal contact information of users to the police upon request. It also requires telecommunication service providers to set up their service in a way &#124; <a href="http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-what-does-bill-c-30-mean-for-privacy/">read more&#8230;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-306" title="i-phone" src="http://acquit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/i-phone-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />For those of you who have been living under a rock for the past week or two, Bill C-30 is the proposed legislation that will require telecommunication service providers to provide personal contact information of users to the police upon request. It also requires telecommunication service providers to set up their service in a way that makes it possible for communications to be organized, intercepted, and delivered to an authorized person working with the RCMP or CSIS.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-617751/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-what-does-bill-c30-mean-privacy">http://www.straight.com/article-617751/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-what-does-bill-c30-mean-privacy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-what-does-bill-c-30-mean-for-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasonable Doubt: Peace bonds demystified and online surveillance bill criticized</title>
		<link>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-peace-bonds-demystified-and-online-surveillance-bill-criticized/</link>
		<comments>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-peace-bonds-demystified-and-online-surveillance-bill-criticized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acquit.ca/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A peace bond is a court order designed to prevent a person from committing or recommitting a crime that has an aspect of violence (i.e. assault, uttering threats, and criminal harassment).[…]The peace bond information can be laid either at the outset of a matter or after criminal charges of another nature have been laid. If &#124; <a href="http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-peace-bonds-demystified-and-online-surveillance-bill-criticized/">read more&#8230;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-301" title="hand-signing-petition-lg" src="http://acquit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/hand-signing-petition-lg-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />A peace bond is a court order designed to prevent a person from committing or recommitting a crime that has an aspect of violence (i.e. assault, uttering threats, and criminal harassment).[…]The peace bond information can be laid either at the outset of a matter or after criminal charges of another nature have been laid. If a criminal charge has been laid, Crown counsel can decide to proceed by way of a peace bond as opposed to continuing with the criminal charge. Crown counsel will look at all of the circumstances in making this determination. They will consider things like the seriousness of the alleged act (if the act giving rise to the charge is not that serious, a peace bond may be sufficient to address the harm done), whether the accused has a criminal record, if this has occurred before in the past, is there still a relationship between the two parties and what is it?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-610561/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-peace-bonds-demystified-and-online-surveillance-bill-criticized">http://www.straight.com/article-610561/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-peace-bonds-demystified-and-online-surveillance-bill-criticized</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-peace-bonds-demystified-and-online-surveillance-bill-criticized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasonable Doubt: To exclude or not to exclude evidence from trial</title>
		<link>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-to-exclude-or-not-to-exclude-evidence-from-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-to-exclude-or-not-to-exclude-evidence-from-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acquit.ca/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grant was a young black man who was walking down the street when he came to the attention of the police. Const. Worrell said that Grant stared at them in an unusually intense manner while fidgeting with his coat and pants. Given his suspicious behavior and their purpose for being in the area, they decided &#124; <a href="http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-to-exclude-or-not-to-exclude-evidence-from-trial/">read more&#8230;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-297" title="empty-street" src="http://acquit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/empty-street-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />Grant was a young black man who was walking down the street when he came to the attention of the police. Const. Worrell said that Grant stared at them in an unusually intense manner while fidgeting with his coat and pants. Given his suspicious behavior and their purpose for being in the area, they decided to stop Grant and see what he was doing in the area.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-604451/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-exclude-or-not-exclude-evidence-trial">http://www.straight.com/article-604451/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-exclude-or-not-exclude-evidence-trial</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-to-exclude-or-not-to-exclude-evidence-from-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasonable Doubt: Dead time and other sentencing terms explained</title>
		<link>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-dead-time-and-other-sentencing-terms-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-dead-time-and-other-sentencing-terms-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acquit.ca/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earned remission? Statutory release? Dead time? Alternative measures or diversion? This week, I’ll continue explaining terms related to serving a sentence. My explanations are a simplified version of an extremely technical, detailed, and nuanced law. http://www.straight.com/article-599641/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-dead-time-and-other-sentencing-terms-explained]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earned remission? S<img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-293" title="history_dictionary" src="http://acquit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/history_dictionary-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />tatutory release? Dead time? Alternative measures or diversion?<strong></strong></p>
<p>This week, I’ll continue explaining terms related to serving a sentence. My explanations are a simplified version of an extremely technical, detailed, and nuanced law.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-599641/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-dead-time-and-other-sentencing-terms-explained">http://www.straight.com/article-599641/vancouver/reasonable-doubt-dead-time-and-other-sentencing-terms-explained</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acquit.ca/2012/03/reasonable-doubt-dead-time-and-other-sentencing-terms-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

